Chris Gainor Liar

Last Updated on 11 months by Roger Nelson

RASCRENEGADE Chris Gainor author and past President National Body RASC. Out of all of the rascrenegade(s) Gainor is one of the most culpable, you will soon see why.

WHAT IS A LIE: The many many lies told by these rascrenegades are now unraveling, because ultimately, a lie will not fit a fact, it will only fit another lie made for that purpose, the life of a lie is just a question of time. And their time is all but up.

On the 5th Day of November 2019. I duly left a voice mail message to Gainor at the number he provided, asking him to call me at his convenience, and provided my contact details. Totally expecting to hear from Gainor shortly, but never did. Instead Watson and Gainor committed the first of many crooked and corrupt acts.

On the 6th November 2019, Chris Gainor President RASC and Michael Watson legal counsel RASC in an unsolicited phone call made to Roger Nelson, attempted by crooked and corrupt means to get Roger to get his wife Grace Nelson to get rid of John Kelly as her Legal representation in the G23 Laird complaint at the Calgary Center branch of the RASC.

WHEN Grace and Roger refused to comply with their scheme to fire John Kelly. Gainor then with Watson and other racsrenegades ambushed Roger Nelson at the end of a regular Board meeting (13th November 2019) by going in-camera and executing their plan to remove him from his position as National Secretary and Chairman of the IT Committee, all because his wife Grace had not fired John Kelly as they had wanted. A recording of that in-camera ambush is available.

Below is an unbelievable e-mail from Gainor to Roger Nelson. Gainor, openly admitting to the crooked and corrupt acts committed by him and his fellow rascrenegades. Going into detail how they had and were, going to orchestrate by corrupt & crooked means Roger Nelsons removal.

GAINOR TO ROGER  NELSON 1ST DECEMBER:   Dear Roger I am writing you because I believe that the time has come where you should have another conversation with Michael Watson and me. Over the weekend, Michael, other members of the RASC Board of Directors and I have been discussing your position on the Board and as Secretary. You no doubt appreciate that receiving communications such as those that John Kelly has been sending us has caused great consternation on the Board. Those communications have called into serious question the trust that we all need to work together on the Board. We recognize that you must be greatly distressed by the criticisms of your actions in recent weeks and of your work on the Board that have been made. I certainly recognize your long record of service to the RASC that continues to the present day, and I can say that the rest of the Board also recognizes it. When you spoke with Michael and me early in November, we were trying to defuse a worsening situation. When that didn’t seem to be working, we began the process that is currently under way inside the Board to resolve the differences between you and the Board. You missed an opportunity to defuse the situation when you declined to fulfill your undertaking to us to apologize to the Board. In spite of that, we on the Board didn’t give up on trying to resolve our differences. We began the process that is currently under way to resolve the differences between you and the Board. You were present at that Board meeting on November 13, and you agreed to take part in the process that is currently under way. Early on, you engaged Mr. Kelly to act on your behalf to deal with your differences with us, and at our suggestion and request you dropped him around the time of the November 13 meeting. And on Friday night you called him back instead of continuing with the process that you had agreed to on November 13. If you were surprised by the statements you received on Friday, I should note that much of what was said in those statements had previously been related to you orally on several occasions, including at the November 13 meeting. Michael and I, on behalf of the Board, want to try one more time to resolve the differences between you and the Board in a friendly fashion. I hope you would be available to speak to us on Monday or Tuesday late afternoon or evening. I should make clear that Mr. Kelly can have no part in any process involving the Board, unless you can prove that he is permitted to practise law somewhere in Canada.  His background and his aggressive, attacking style of advocacy can only worsen the situation. I look forward to hearing from you, and Michael and I hope to talk to you in the next couple of days. Sincerely, Chris. ” 

Chris Gainor and Watson a lawyer and partner with Gowling WLG, had no jurisdiction over the G23 process they inserted themselves into a month before. On December 1st, their only goal was to stop from coming to light, the corrupt, crooked and criminal acts they and their fellow rascrenegades had committed.

Proof of Gainors professional misconduct, corrupt, crooked and criminal acts, are all contained within, his admissions, emails, tape recordings, telephone calls, overt acts, covert acts, directions and much more.

All rascrenegades of the RASC were asked the following question.

Q.  if it’s found at the end of this process, that a person has submitted a statement to Mr. Gainor, and it’s found that much of the contents of that statement are false. And that they’ve done so (and other corrrupt acts) in furtherance of having Roger and Grace Nelson removed from the RASC, do you believe that, which ever person has done that, should themselves be removed from the RASC.

They all refuse to answer, as to do so condemns them & their fellow rascrenegades.